Argumentative Essay 格式、技巧與常見錯誤全解析

「點解我寫咗咁多論點，個marker都話我內容空泛？」

「明明有Counter-argument，點解Organization分數咁低？」 

「我背咗好多Formal Phrases，點解Language得Level 3？」

如果以上問題曾經困擾著你，你絕對不是一個人。

英文議論文(argumentative essay) 是英文DSE 卷二English Writing最令考生又愛又恨的文體。愛，是因為它不需要天馬行空的創意；恨，是因為無論你準備得多充足，總會在考場上腦袋一片空白，不知從何入手。你可能花了大量時間背誦範文金句，卻在真正寫作時發現全部用不上；你可能有滿腔想法想表達，卻不知道如何組織成一篇說服力強的文章。

問題的核心往往不在於你的英文能力夠不夠好，而是你沒有掌握正確的Argumentative Essay 格式。一篇優秀的議論文格式，就像一座建築物——沒有穩固的結構，再華麗的裝飾都只是虛有其表。考評局的評卷員每年要批改數萬份試卷，他們最想看到的是：清晰的立場、有力的論證、完整的結構，以及批判性的思維。

本文將為你完整拆解Argumentative Essay 格式的所有秘密——從考評局最推崇的「3正1反1駁」結構、PEEL段落寫法、Counter-argument和Rebuttal的技巧，到最常犯的致命錯誤和範例。無論你現在是Level 3掙扎求合格，還是Level 4想衝破樽頸上Level 5**，這篇議論文argumentative essay格式全攻略都能幫助你找到突破點。

準備好了嗎？讓我們一起攻克英文DSE卷二議論文這道難關，用正確的Argumentative Essay 格式，寫出讓評卷員眼前一亮的高分作文！

什麼是議論文 Argumentative Essay？

英文議論文 Argumentative Essay是英文DSE卷二中最常見且最重要的文體之一，要求學生就某個具爭議性的議題表達清晰立場，並提供有力論據支持自己的觀點。與說明文（Expository Essay）或記敘文（Narrative Essay）不同，議論文argumentative essay 格式的核心目的是說服讀者接受你的觀點，或至少認真考慮你的立場。

在DSE English Writing中，議論文可能以不同形式出現：

• 純議論文（Essay）：”Write an essay discussing whether…”
• 議論性文章（Article）：”Write an article for your school magazine expressing your views…”
• 議論性演講辭（Speech）：”Write a speech arguing that…”
• 給編輯的信（Letter to the Editor）：”Write a letter to the editor stating your position on…”

 

雖然這些題目的文體名稱不同，但它們的核心都是議論，因此都需要遵循基本的Argumentative Essay 格式原則。掌握標準議論文格式後，你就能靈活應對各種DSE English writing 的變化。

為什麼 Argumentative Essay 格式這麼重要？

在英文DSE 卷二的評分準則中，Organization（組織）佔20%，而Content（內容）和Language（語言）各佔40%。正確的Argumentative Essay 格式不僅能直接提升Organization分數，更能間接改善Content和Language的表現：

對Organization的影響：

• 清晰的議論文argumentative essay格式讓評卷員一眼就能看出你的文章結構完整
• 邏輯遞進的論點排列展現你的思維組織能力
• 恰當的劃分段落和使用過渡詞提升文章流暢度

 

對Content的影響：

• 完整的Argumentative Essay 格式確保你涵蓋所有必要元素（立場、論點、反駁）
• Counter-argument和Rebuttal展現批判性思維和思考深度
• 有結構的論證讓你的例子和論據更有說服力

 

對Language的影響：

• 不同部分的argumentative essay格式需要不同的語言表達，促使你運用多樣化句式
• 論證過程中自然地使用高階連接詞和過渡詞
• 清晰的結構讓你能更專注於語言表達的精準度

 

簡單來說，正確的Argumentative Essay 格式是你取得高分的基礎，沒有它，再好的內容和語言都無法發揮最大效果。

考評局最推崇的 Argumentative Essay 格式結構

根據歷年DSE評卷報告和Argumentative essay 5**範文分析，考評局最想見到的議論文格式是：

方案一：3正 + 1反 + 1駁論

這是最經典的Argumentative Essay 格式，適合大部分議論文題目：

Introduction（Hook + Background + Thesis Statement）

↓

Body Paragraph 1 – 第一個支持論點（我方論據）

↓

Body Paragraph 2 – 第二個支持論點（我方論據）

↓

Body Paragraph 3 – 第三個支持論點（我方論據）

↓

Body Paragraph 4 – Counter-argument（反方論點）

↓

Body Paragraph 5 – Rebuttal（駁論）

↓

Conclusion（結論段）

1. 先聲奪人：開場就用三個強而有力的論點建立你的立場
2. 展現公平：承認反方觀點，顯示你考慮周全
3. 強勢收尾：用駁論反擊，最後鞏固自己的立場
4. 邏輯清晰：評卷員能輕易跟隨你的論證思路

 

方案二：3反 + 1正 + 1駁論

Introduction（Hook + Background + Thesis Statement）

↓

Body Paragraph 1 – 第一個反對論點（指出問題）

↓

Body Paragraph 2 – 第二個反對論點（指出問題）

↓

Body Paragraph 3 – 第三個反對論點（指出問題）

↓

Body Paragraph 4 – Counter-argument（你的解決方案）

↓

Body Paragraph 5 – Rebuttal（說明為何你的方案更優）

↓

Conclusion（結論段）

• 題目要求你「建議改變」或「提出解決方案」
• 你先指出現狀的問題，再提出你的立場作為解決方法
• 例如：”Should school uniforms be abolished?”（x 想制服的三大問題，再提出廢除是最佳方案）

 

完整 Argumentative Essay 格式逐部分詳解

讓我們深入了解議論文格式每個部分的具體寫法和技巧。

Part 1: Introduction（引言段）

Introduction是Argumentative Essay 格式的門面，決定評卷員對你文章的第一印象。一個出色的引言段應包含三個關鍵元素：

1. Hook（開場白）- 吸引讀者注意

Hook是議論文 argumentative essay 格式中最容易被忽略但極其重要的部分。一個好的Hook能立即抓住評卷員的注意力，為你的文章加分。

四種Hook技巧：

技巧一：反問句（Rhetorical Question）

• “What if I told you that the device in your pocket could revolutionize education?”
• “Have we forgotten the true purpose of education in our obsession with exam results?”
• 優點：直接與讀者互動，引發思考
• 適用於：需要挑戰常識或引發情感共鳴的議題

 

技巧二：驚人數據或事實（Shocking Statistics/Facts）

• “Every day, Hong Kong students spend an average of 8 hours on social media—more time than they spend in school.”
• “According to recent research, 70% of Hong Kong teenagers report feeling overwhelmed by academic pressure.”
• 優點：具權威性，立即建立可信性
• 適用於：社會議題、教育問題、健康相關話題

 

技巧三：引用名言（Quotation）

• “As Nelson Mandela once said, ‘Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.'”
• “Albert Einstein famously remarked, ‘Imagination is more important than knowledge.'”
• 優點：借名人之口增強說服力
• 注意：不要用過於陳腔濫調的引言（如”Practice makes perfect”）

 

技巧四：場景描述或故事（Scenario）

• “Picture this: a student sits in front of a computer screen at 2am, desperately trying to complete yet another assignment while fighting exhaustion.”
• “Last year, a tragic incident shocked Hong Kong when a student took their own life due to unbearable academic pressure.”
• 優點：生動具體，引發情感共鳴
• 適用於：需要emotional appeal的議題

 

常犯錯誤：

• ❌ Hook過長，佔據整段篇幅
• ❌ 使用陳腔濫調：”Nowadays…” / “In today’s society…” / “In the 21st century…”
• ❌ Hook與主題關聯不大，為吸引而吸引

 

2. Background（背景資訊）- 提供語境

Background在Argumentative Essay 格式中銜接Hook和Thesis Statement，提供必要的背景資訊讓讀者理解議題。

Background應該包含：

• 議題的基本資訊或定義
• 為什麼這個議題重要或具爭議性
• 當時的討論或辯論狀況

 

範例： “The debate over smartphone usage in classrooms has intensified in recent years. While some educators view these devices as disruptive distractions that undermine traditional learning, others recognize their potential as powerful educational tools. This controversy has sparked heated discussions among parents, teachers, and policymakers worldwide.”

技巧：

• 保持簡潔（2-3句）
• 呈現議題的兩面性，顯示你了解爭議所在
• 使用平衡的語言，不要在Background就偏向一方

 

3. Thesis Statement（立場聲明）- 表明你的立場

Thesis Statement是議論文格式最關鍵的一句，必須清晰、具體、有力地表達你的立場。

優秀Thesis Statement的特徵：

✅ 明確表態：不含糊、不模棱兩可

• 弱：Smartphone use in classrooms has both advantages and disadvantages.
• 強：Smartphones should be permitted in classrooms under proper supervision.

 

✅ 預告論點：提示文章將討論的主要論據

• “I firmly believe that smartphones should be permitted in classrooms, as they enhance learning efficiency, foster collaboration, and prepare students for the digital workplace.”

 

✅ 有辯論空間：不是顯而易見的事實，而是可辯論的觀點

• 弱：Hong Kong is a densely populated city.（事實，無辯論空間）
• 強：Hong Kong’s education system places excessive emphasis on exam results at the expense of holistic development.（觀點，可辯論）

 

✅ 具體明確：避免模糊用詞

• 弱：I think smartphones are good for education.
• 強：Smartphones are indispensable educational tools that can transform traditional pedagogy when integrated thoughtfully into the curriculum.

 

完整Introduction範例（Hook + Background + Thesis Statement）：

“[Hook] Imagine a classroom where every student has instant access to the world’s knowledge at their fingertips. [Background] The debate over smartphone usage in classrooms has become increasingly contentious, with educators divided between viewing these devices as distracting nuisances or transformative learning tools. [Thesis Statement] I firmly believe that smartphones should be permitted in classrooms, as they enhance educational outcomes, foster collaborative learning, and prepare students for the digital demands of modern society.”

這個Introduction完美展現了Argumentative Essay 格式的標準開場，長度適中（約70-80字），結構清晰，立場鮮明。

Part 2: Body Paragraphs（主體段落）- 論證核心

Body Paragraphs是議論文 argumentative essay格式的核心，佔據文章60-70%的篇幅。每個Body Paragraph都應該遵循PEEL結構，確保論證完整有力。

PEEL結構 – 議論文 格式的黃金法則

PEEL是Argumentative Essay 格式中最重要的段落組織技巧：

• P = Point（論點） – 主題句
• E = Explain（解釋） – 詳細闡述
• E = Example（例子） – 具體證據
• L = Link（連結） – 連接回到原先的討論主題

 

讓我們逐一拆解：

P – Point (Topic Sentence 主題句)

主題句是每個Body Paragraph的第一句，必須清晰表達該段的中心論點。

主題句的特徵：

• 一句話概括整段內容
• 直接支持你的Thesis Statement
• 包含關鍵詞和提示語

 

提示語（Signposting）：

• 第一個論點：Firstly, / To begin with, / First and foremost, / My first (and most important) point is that
• 第二個論點：Secondly, / Furthermore, / Moreover, / In addition, / Another crucial point is that
• 第三個論點：Thirdly, / More importantly, / Most significantly, / Finally, / Above all,

 

範例：

• “Firstly, smartphones facilitate instant access to vast educational resources.”
• “Furthermore, these devices enable collaborative learning through innovative educational applications.”
• “Most importantly, smartphone literacy prepares students for the technological demands of the modern workplace.”

 

常犯錯誤：

• ❌ 主題句過於籠統：”Smartphones are good for education.”
• ❌ 主題句是問句：”Why are smartphones useful?”
• ❌ 主題句包含例子：”According to research, 80% of students use smartphones.” (這應該放在Example部分)

 

E – Explain (解釋)

Explain部分在argumentative essay 格式中負責詳細闡述你的論點，說明為什麼這個論點成立，如何支持你的立場。

如何有效Explain：

1. 定義關鍵概念（如需要）
2. 說明因果關係
3. 解釋論點的重要性
4. 預先回應可能的質疑

範例： “[Point] Firstly, smartphones facilitate instant access to vast educational resources. [Explain] In traditional classrooms, students often encounter unfamiliar concepts or terms that disrupt their learning flow. With smartphones, however, they can immediately search for clarifications, definitions, or additional examples without waiting for teacher assistance. This immediate access transforms passive learning into an active, self-directed exploration process, empowering students to take ownership of their education.”

注意Explain部分如何：

• 指出問題（traditional classrooms的限制）
• 說明解決方法（smartphones如何解決）
• 解釋影響（transforms learning, empowers students）

 

進階技巧：使用讓步句式

在Explain部分加入讓步，展現成熟思維： “While some may argue that students could misuse smartphones for non-academic purposes, this concern can be easily addressed through clear usage guidelines and teacher supervision. The educational benefits, however, far outweigh these manageable risks.”

E – Example (例子)

Example是Argumentative Essay 格式中最容易被忽略但最關鍵的部分。具體、貼切的例子能大幅提升Content分數。

六種有效的Example類型：

1. 統計數據（Statistics）

• “For instance, a 2023 study by the University of Hong Kong found that students who used educational apps showed a 35% improvement in test scores compared to those who relied solely on textbooks.”
• 優點：具權威性、客觀
• 來源：真實數據

 

2. 研究結果（Research Findings）

• “According to recent research published in the Journal of Educational Technology, interactive learning platforms increase student engagement by up to 60%.”
• 優點：顯示你關注學術資訊
• 技巧：用”recent research” / “studies show” / “researchers found”增加可信度

 

3. 現實案例（Real-life Examples）

• “Singapore’s education system provides a compelling example. After integrating smartphones into classrooms with proper guidelines, the country saw improved digital literacy rates and maintained high academic standards.”
• 優點：具體、可視化
• 適用：社會議題、教育政策、國際比較

 

4. 個人經歷（Personal Experience）

• “During my own experience with educational apps like Duolingo, I found that gamified learning made vocabulary acquisition not only more effective but also genuinely enjoyable.”
• 優點：真實、有感染力
• 注意：不要過度使用，保持客觀性

 

5. 假設情境（Hypothetical Scenarios）

• “Consider a history lesson on the French Revolution. Without smartphones, students are limited to textbook descriptions. With smartphones, however, they can instantly access primary sources, virtual museum tours, and documentary clips that bring history to life.”
• 優點：生動、易於理解
• 適用：需要說明abstract concepts的時候

 

6. 專家意見（Expert Opinions）

• “As renowned educator Sir Ken Robinson argued, ’21st-century learners require 21st-century tools.’ Smartphones, as ubiquitous digital devices, perfectly embody these modern learning tools.”
• 優點：借權威增強說服力
• 技巧：可以paraphrase名人觀點，不一定要exact quote

 

Example的長度和數量：

• 每個論點至少1個例子
• 200字段落：1個詳細例子
• 400字段落：1-2個例子

 

常犯錯誤：

• ❌ 沒有例子，只有空泛陳述
• ❌ 例子與論點關聯不大
• ❌ 例子過於簡短，缺乏細節
• ❌ 過度依賴個人經歷，缺乏客觀性

 

L – Link (連結)

Link是議論文 argumentative essay 格式中最容易被遺忘的部分，但它對文章連貫性至關重要。

Link的兩個功能：

1. 連結回Thesis Statement
   • 重申這個論點如何支持你的整體立場
   • “Therefore, rather than hindering education, smartphones empower students to become independent learners.”
2. 過渡到下一段
   • 為下一個論點鋪路
   • “Beyond individual learning benefits, smartphones also transform how students collaborate with peers.”

 

Link常用句式：

• Consequently, / Therefore, / Thus, / Hence,
• This demonstrates that / This shows that / This proves that
• Clearly, / Evidently, / Obviously,
• It is evident that / It is clear that

 

完整PEEL段落範例：

“[Point] Firstly, smartphones facilitate instant access to vast educational resources. [Explain] In traditional classrooms, students often struggle when encountering unfamiliar concepts or terms, disrupting their learning flow. With smartphones, however, they can immediately search for clarifications, definitions, or additional examples without waiting for teacher assistance. This immediate access to information transforms passive learning into an active, self-directed exploration process. [Example] For instance, during a history lesson on the French Revolution, students can quickly access primary sources, view interactive timelines, or watch documentary clips to deepen their understanding. A 2022 study by the Education Bureau found that students who regularly used smartphones for research demonstrated 40% better information literacy skills than their peers. [Link] Therefore, rather than hindering education, smartphones empower students to take ownership of their learning journey and develop crucial research skills for the 21st century.”

這個段落完美展現了Argumentative Essay 格式的PEEL結構，長度約150-180字，是議論文格式Body Paragraph的理想範例。

Part 3: Counter-argument（反方論點）

Counter-argument是議論文 格式中展現批判性思維的關鍵部分，也是區分Level 4和Level 5作文的重要指標。

為什麼需要Counter-argument？

在Argumentative Essay 格式中，Counter-argument不是弱化你的立場，而是：

✅ 展現公平：證明你考慮了不同觀點 

✅ 顯示深度：展現批判性思維和思考成熟度 

✅ 增強說服力：預先回應反對者的質疑，使你的論證更完整 

 

Counter-argument Argumentative essay格式寫法

結構：

1. Transition（轉折） – 用轉折詞引入反方觀點
2. State Counter-argument（陳述反方論點） – 公平、客觀地呈現反方立場
3. Brief Explanation（簡短解釋） – 說明為何有人支持這個觀點

 

Transition常用句式：

• However, / Nevertheless, / Nonetheless,
• On the flip side, / On the other hand,
• Admittedly, / It must be acknowledged that
• Some may argue that / Critics contend that / Opponents claim that
• Despite these benefits, / Notwithstanding these advantages,

 

Counter-argument範例：

“[Transition] However, critics argue that smartphones in classrooms create more problems than they solve. [State Counter-argument] They contend that these devices are primarily sources of distraction, with students more likely to browse social media, play games, or message friends than engage with educational content. [Brief Explanation] This concern is not unfounded, as numerous studies have documented instances of students misusing technology during lessons, leading to decreased attention spans and reduced face-to-face interaction among peers.”

Counter-argument寫作技巧：

技巧一：選擇你能反駁的論點

• ✅ 選擇一個合情理但有漏洞的反方論點
• ❌ 不要選擇無法反駁的強力論點
• ❌ 不要選擇太弱的稻草人論點（strawman argument）

 

技巧二：公平呈現，不要扭曲

• ✅ 客觀陳述反方觀點：”Critics argue that…” / “Opponents contend that…”
• ❌ 不要貶低或諷刺：”Some ignorant people think…” / “Foolishly, some believe…”

 

技巧三：承認合理性

• ✅ “This concern is understandable…” / “This viewpoint has some merit…”
• 這樣做會令你的Rebuttal更有力

 

技巧四：保持簡潔

• Counter-argument段落應比支持論點段落的長度短
• 約80-100字即可
• 不要給反方論點過多篇幅

 

常犯錯誤：

• ❌ Counter-argument比支持論點更有說服力，削弱了自己的立場
• ❌ 沒有公平呈現反方觀點，只是為了反駁而設立稻草人
• ❌ Counter-argument過長，佔據過多篇幅
• ❌ 使用情緒化或攻擊性語言

 

Part 4: Rebuttal（駁論）

Rebuttal是Argumentative Essay的精華，最能展現你的邏輯思維和批判能力。一個有力的Rebuttal能徹底扭轉局勢，鞏固你的立場。

Rebuttal在議論文中的重要性

Rebuttal不只是「不同意」反方觀點，而是：

• 指出反方論點的邏輯漏洞
• 提供證據證明反方論點站不住腳
• 解釋為何你的立場更優越
• 最終強化你的Thesis Statement

 

Rebuttal的四種策略

策略一：指出邏輯謬誤（Point Out Logical Flaws）

找出反方論點的邏輯錯誤或思考盲點。

範例： “[Rebuttal開場] While this concern appears valid at first glance, it fails to consider a crucial factor: the role of proper implementation. [指出漏洞] The problem lies not in smartphones themselves, but in the absence of clear usage guidelines. [解釋] Just as we don’t ban pens because students might doodle instead of taking notes, we shouldn’t prohibit smartphones due to potential misuse. [強化] The solution is not elimination but education—teaching students digital responsibility and establishing clear classroom protocols.”

策略二：提供反證（Provide Counter-evidence）

用證據證明反方論點不成立或過時。

範例： “[Rebuttal開場] This argument, however, is contradicted by empirical evidence. [提供反證] A comprehensive study conducted across 50 Hong Kong secondary schools in 2023 found that when smartphones were integrated with proper supervision, on-task behavior actually increased by 25%, and incidents of misuse decreased to less than 5%. [解釋] These findings suggest that with appropriate management, smartphones enhance rather than hinder classroom engagement. [強化] The key is not whether to allow smartphones, but how to integrate them effectively.”

策略三：承認但減少弊端（Acknowledge but Minimize）

承認反方論點有一定道理，但論證其影響較小或可以管理。

範例： “[Rebuttal開場] Admittedly, the potential for distraction cannot be entirely dismissed. [承認] However, this challenge is far from insurmountable. [Minimise] Schools can implement simple yet effective measures: establishing clear usage policies, using monitoring apps that restrict access to non-educational content during lessons, and training teachers in digital classroom management. [對比] When weighed against the substantial educational benefits—instant access to information, enhanced collaboration, and development of digital literacy—these manageable concerns pale in significance. [強化] The benefits decisively outweigh the drawbacks.”

策略四：轉守為攻（Turn the Table）

將反方論點轉化為支持你立場的證據。

範例： “[Rebuttal開場] Ironically, this very concern about distraction actually strengthens the case for allowing smartphones in classrooms. [轉折] By banning smartphones, we deprive students of opportunities to develop digital self-discipline—a crucial skill in our technology-saturated world. [解釋] Learning to use smartphones responsibly in a supervised classroom environment better prepares students for university and workplace settings where such self-regulation is essential. [強化] Rather than shielding students from technology, we should be teaching them to harness it productively.”

Rebuttal段落完整範例

“[Transition] While this concern about distraction appears valid at first glance, it fundamentally misidentifies the problem. [Point out flaw] The issue lies not in smartphones themselves, but in inadequate classroom management and unclear usage policies. [Counter-evidence] Indeed, a 2023 study by the Education University of Hong Kong found that schools with clear digital device policies reported 30% fewer distraction incidents than those with outright bans, which paradoxically increased surreptitious phone use. [Explanation] Moreover, learning to use technology responsibly in a supervised environment is precisely the kind of digital citizenship we should be cultivating. [Turn the table] By prohibiting smartphones, we miss a valuable opportunity to teach students self-regulation skills essential for the modern workplace. [Strengthen position] When properly managed, smartphones transform from potential distractions into powerful learning tools. [Final assertion] The solution is not prohibition but thoughtful integration.”

這個Rebuttal段落展現了議論文 格式中駁論的完美結構，約120-150字，運用多種策略，邏輯嚴密，說服力強。

Rebuttal常用句式：

引入Rebuttal：

• While this argument may seem convincing, / Although this concern is understandable,
• This viewpoint, however, overlooks / This argument fails to consider
• On closer examination, / Upon further scrutiny,
• Contrary to this claim, / In fact, / Actually,

 

指出缺陷：

• This argument is flawed because…
• This reasoning fails to account for…
• This perspective overlooks the fact that…
• The fundamental problem with this argument is…
• This claim rests on the false assumption that…

 

提供反駁證據：

• Evidence suggests otherwise…
• Research demonstrates that…
• Statistics reveal a different picture…
• Empirical data contradicts this claim…
• Numerous studies have shown that…

 

強化你的立場：

• In reality, / In fact, / Actually,
• Far from [negative claim], [positive outcome]
• Rather than [problem], [solution/benefit]
• Not only does this argument fail, but it also…
• When properly examined, the evidence overwhelmingly supports…

 

結尾強調：

• Therefore, / Consequently, / Thus,
• This clearly demonstrates that…
• It is evident that…
• The benefits decisively outweigh…
• This reinforces the position that…

 

常犯錯誤：

• ❌ Rebuttal太弱，無法真正反駁Counter-argument
• ❌ 只是重複支持論點，沒有直接回應反方觀點
• ❌ 使用攻擊性或情緒化語言
• ❌ Rebuttal過長，失去焦點
• ❌ 引入新的論點而非反駁Counter-argument

 

Part 5: Conclusion（結論段）

Conclusion是Argumentative Essay 格式的最後印象，必須簡潔有力，留下深刻印象。

Conclusion在議論文 格式中的三大功能

1. 重申立場：用不同字眼再次表明你的Thesis Statement
2. 總結論據：簡要回顧主要論點
3. 強力收尾：提供發人深省的最後思考或行動呼籲

 

Conclusion的標準結構

不要寫的內容：

• ❌ 引入新論點或新例子
• ❌ 完全重複Introduction的Thesis Statement
• ❌ 使用陳腔濫調：”In conclusion, I have discussed…”
• ❌ 突然改變立場或語氣
• ❌ 道歉或表示不確定：”Although I may be wrong…”

 

應該包含的元素：

1. Restate Thesis（重申論點）

用不同字眼重申你的立場，顯示語言能力。

弱範例： “In conclusion, I believe smartphones should be allowed in classrooms.”（幾乎與Thesis Statement一模一樣）

強範例： “In light of the evidence presented, it is clear that the integration of smartphones into educational settings represents not a threat to learning, but rather an unprecedented opportunity to enhance it.”

2. Summarize Main Points（總結論點）

簡潔回顧2-3個主要論據（不要重複細節）。

範例： “As demonstrated, these devices provide instant access to educational resources, facilitate collaborative learning, and prepare students for the digital workplace.”

技巧：用一句話總結所有論點

• 避免：”First, smartphones help with research. Second, they help with collaboration. Third, they help with digital skills.”（太機械化）
• 推薦：”From enhanced information access to improved collaboration and digital literacy development, the educational benefits of smartphones are comprehensive and compelling.”

 

3. Final Thought（最後思考）

這是議論文 Argumentative essay Conclusion的精華，有多種寫法：

寫法一：Call to Action（行動呼籲） “It is time for educators and policymakers to embrace this technological shift and implement thoughtful smartphone integration policies in all schools.”

寫法二：展望未來（Future Implications） “As we move further into the digital age, the question is no longer whether to allow smartphones in classrooms, but how to maximize their educational potential while minimizing risks.”

寫法三：擴大視野（Broader Significance） “This debate transcends the simple question of device usage—it fundamentally challenges how we define education in the 21st century.”

寫法四：發人深省的問題（Thought-provoking Question） “If we continue to ban the very tools that define modern life, how can we claim to be preparing students for their future?”

寫法五：回應Hook（首尾呼應） 如果Introduction用了場景或問題，Conclusion可以回應它： “The classroom of the future I described is not a distant dream—it is within our reach. By embracing smartphones as educational tools, we can transform that vision into reality for every student.”

完整Conclusion範例

範例一（標準結構）：

“[Restate thesis] In light of the compelling evidence presented, it is indisputable that smartphones, when properly integrated, represent powerful educational tools rather than mere distractions. [Summarize] From facilitating instant access to vast information resources to enabling innovative collaborative learning and cultivating essential digital literacy, these devices offer transformative benefits that far outweigh manageable concerns. [Call to action] It is time for educational institutions to move beyond outdated prohibitions and embrace thoughtful smartphone integration policies. [Final thought] After all, preparing students for a digital future requires equipping them not only with knowledge but also with the technological fluency to navigate an increasingly connected world. The classroom of tomorrow demands the tools of today.”

範例二（首尾呼應）：

“[Restate thesis] The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that smartphones belong in classrooms as essential learning tools, not as prohibited devices. [Summarize] Through enhanced information access, collaborative capabilities, and digital skill development, these ubiquitous devices can revolutionize education when guided by clear policies and effective supervision. [Echo introduction] Remember the classroom I envisioned at the beginning—where every student has the world’s knowledge at their fingertips? [Final thought] This is not a futuristic fantasy but an achievable reality. The question we face is not whether we can afford to allow smartphones in schools, but whether we can afford not to.”

範例三（擴大視野）：

“[Restate thesis] Ultimately, the smartphone debate encapsulates a much larger question about the nature of modern education. [Summarize] By recognizing these devices as gateways to information, platforms for collaboration, and training grounds for digital citizenship, we acknowledge that effective 21st-century pedagogy must evolve alongside technological advancement. [Broader significance] This is not merely about allowing or banning a device—it is about reimagining education for a generation that will inherit a world we can barely imagine. [Final thought] In preparing students for their future, we must embrace the tools that will define it.”

Conclusion常用句式

重申立場：

• In conclusion, / To conclude, / In summary,
• Ultimately, / In the final analysis,
• In light of the evidence presented,
• Taking all factors into consideration,
• After careful examination of both sides,
• It is clear/evident/indisputable that…
• The evidence overwhelmingly supports…

 

看完這篇完整的議論文 格式攻略，你是否開始明白為什麼自己過去的議論文總是拿不到高分？問題不在於你的英文是否不夠好，而是你沒有掌握正確的Argumentative Essay 格式。

從Hook到Thesis Statement，從PEEL結構到Counter-argument和Rebuttal，從論點排列到Conclusion收尾——每一個部分都有其特定的作用和技巧。這不是死記硬背就能掌握的，而是需要有系統的學習、大量的練習，以及專業導師的針對性指導。

你可能會問：「我自己跟住呢篇文章練習，係咪就可以攞到高分？」

理論上可以，但實際上：

• ❌ 你的議論文格式有沒有錯誤，自己很難發現
• ❌ 你的Counter-argument夠不夠強、Rebuttal夠不夠有力，需要有經驗的人評估
• ❌ 你的PEEL結構是否完整、論點是否有層次，需要專業批改
• ❌ 你在時間壓力下能否正確運用Argumentative Essay 格式，需要實戰訓練

 

這就是你需要凝皓教育的 DSE 英文常規課程的原因。

為何選擇凝皓教育的 DSE 英文常規課程？

 

📝 Paper 2 專項突破 – 完整掌握所有 DSE 寫作格式

凝皓教育不只教你Argumentative Essay 格式，更會系統性拆解英文DSE 卷二所有文體：

✅ 議論文 Argumentative Essay 格式 – 3正1反1駁結構、PEEL段落寫法、Counter-argument和Rebuttal技巧 

✅ 書信 Letter 格式 – Formal/Informal Letter、稱呼結尾配對、Letter of Advice 

✅ 報告 Report 格式 – 小標題運用、數據呈現、客觀語氣掌握 ✅ 計劃書 Proposal 格式 – 完整結構、說服技巧、可行性論證 

✅ 演講辭 Speech 格式 – 修辭手法、情感訴求、互動技巧 

✅ 文章 Article 格式 – 吸引標題、生動開場、個人風格

不只教格式，更教你如何在考試中靈活運用！

每週作文批改，針對性改善你的：

• Content：論點是否切題、例子是否具體、論證是否有力
• Language：詞彙運用、句式變化、文法準確度
• Organization：議論文 格式是否正確、段落是否連貫、結構是否完整

 

🎯 全面覆蓋四卷，突破 DSE 英文樽頸

凝皓教育的 DSE 英文常規課程不只專注Paper 2，而是四卷並重：

📖 Paper 1: Reading

• 題型搶分實戰技巧
• 保證應付DSE試題

 

✍️ Paper 2: Writing

• 拆解歷年DSE題型、常見題目
• 深入了解考評要求
• 掌握最能給評卷員留下深刻印象的5**寫作方法
• 包括完整的Argumentative Essay 格式訓練

 

🎧 Paper 3: Listening & Integrated Skills

• 提早熟悉Part B各種題型
• 完美避開考試陷阱
• 傳授最強框架答題法
• 輕鬆命中Content Points

 

🗣️ Paper 4: Speaking

• 講解奪分指標+搶分技巧
• 舉辦Oral Practice實戰演練
• 大幅提升DSE臨場發揮水平

 

立即報名凝皓教育 DSE 英文常規課程，讓專業導師手把手指導你掌握完美的Arguementative essay格式，在DSE English Writing中脫穎而出！

學生好評